Monday, September 08, 2008

Hill/Sodrel spat cont'd: is this a good enough reason to sack all public debates?

Another article on the Hill/Sodrel spat and its implications for debates this Fall-- this one from Dan Davis in the Seymour Tribune...

A disagreement over how a former congressman handled constituent files when leaving office two years ago has 9th District debates on hold...

Katie Moreau of Hill's campaign staff said the incumbent wants a clear explanation from Sodrel on how constituent requests were handled following his loss in the 2006 election.

Ryan Reger of Sodrel's campaign said that complaint has no merit....

Reger said he would like to see more debates.

Schansberg agreed.

"It should be a no-brainer to have the debates we had in 2006," he said. "As the incumbent, Baron Hill has the most control in arranging the debates. Given Baron's repeated demands for debates throughout 2006, I would expect him to be aggressive in setting up debates this time as well. Unfortunately, so far, that has not been the case."

Moreau said Hill wants to debate but first wants an explanation from Sodrel about complaints that his office failed to forward constituent case files when leaving office following his 2006 election loss.

"It caused a lot of work for the people from the 9th District who were asking for help," Moreau said.

She said Sodrel's "first response was an outright lie - that we didn't transfer paperwork in 2004 (when Sodrel defeated Hill). We had letters sent to people asking their permission to send their cases on to the next legislator. The people we heard back from, we handed over the casework file."

Reger was dismissive of Moreau's question.

"They tried to bring that up earlier," he said. "That question's been asked and answered. They're just changing the subject with something they think happened two years ago."

Questioned Wednesday about how constituent cases were handled, Reger referred to a Congressional Research Service Report outlining procedures and said they were followed.

"I spoke with the people who worked in Mike's congressional office at the end of 2006, and they told me that they received information from an office within the U.S. House that explained the proper closing procedure and that they followed it," he said.

He said a letter was sent from Sodrel's office to constituents with open files telling them of the status of their case and what they needed to do to continue them.

But Mike Self of Seymour said Friday he never received such a letter....

When Hill took office in January 2007, Self contacted the congressman's staff to ask about his disability request.

"They didn't have anything, so I had to fill out the paperwork again, but I heard real soon from Social Security after filing it with Hill's office," Self said....

Questioned about Self's case, Reger said Friday letters sent to constituents were by first-class mail....

Schansberg expressed dismay with the seemingly endless debate every election cycle over whether candidates will debate and the discussions about their formats.

"If I'm elected, I promise that I will always provide at least three debates for the voters of the 9th District," he said. "And I won't make things difficult for those who work so hard to arrange the debates."...